Cases 61 - 70 of 260
MACE et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80180
Plaintiff:
LLOYD C MACE and OPAL P MACE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80186
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80171
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80178
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNINGS et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80177
Plaintiff:
BILL JENNINGS and BARBARA JENNINGS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNINGS et al v. KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv79333
Plaintiff:
BILL JENNINGS and BARBARA JENNINGS
Defendant:
KELSEY-HAYES COMPANY , CHRYSLER MOTOR CORPORATION , FORD MOTOR COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80174
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80182
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80184
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80172
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
