Cases 61 - 70 of 128
Lewis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00193
Plaintiff:
Judy Lewis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Marriott International Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv05299
Plaintiff:
L. Hale Lewis
Defendant:
Marriott International Inc. , Aimbridge Hospitality LLC , Zachary S. Stannard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04927
Plaintiff:
Steven Lewis
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackie v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04888
Plaintiff:
Lewis Jackie
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04887
Plaintiff:
Niema Lewis
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. University Hospital et al
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
Chaslie Lawrence Lewis and Petrice Risks
Defendant:
University Hospital, University Hospital Board of Commissioners, Jim Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Jones v. Anderson et al
as 5:2017cv00077
Plaintiff:
Sredrick Jones
Defendant:
Wallace Steve Anderson , Tammy Nichole Bass , South Georgia Correctional Medicine, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ricci v. The DIRECTV Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01322
Plaintiff:
Michele Renae Ricci
Defendant:
The DIRECTV Group, Inc. and David Lewis Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lewis v. Wa-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
Maurice Lewis
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
StopLoss Specialists, LLC et al v. VeriClaim, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03644
Plaintiff:
StopLoss Specialists, LLC and John Lewis
Defendant:
VeriClaim, Inc. and Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
