Cases 61 - 70 of 6,550
BACK, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86531
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM CARROL BECK
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GUIN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86570
Plaintiff:
DENNIS STEPHEN GUIN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BROWN, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86539
Plaintiff:
WINDELL ALTON BROWN
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JENKINS v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86052
Plaintiff:
HOWARD JENKINS
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
THURMAN v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86188
Plaintiff:
KEITH THURMAN
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PADEN v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86067
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE PADEN
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARVEY v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86049
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA HARVEY
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
JONES v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86103
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JONES
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARBER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86034
Plaintiff:
BRYAN C. BARBER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MARRONE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86113
Plaintiff:
MARY JEAN MARRONE
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, A.C. AND S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
