Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Hayden et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2015cv02275
Defendant:
National Automotive Parts Association, Avondale Industries, Inc., Chevron Oronite Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline S. Hayden and Thomas H. Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Savoie et al v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company et al
as 2:2015cv01220
Plaintiff:
Lorita M Savoie , Marcia Savoie Medlin , Craig M Savoie and others
Defendant:
Huntington Ingalls Incorporated , Albert L Bossier, Jr , J Melton Garrett and others
Third_party_defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , International Paper Company and Claims Resolution Management Corporation
Cross_claimant:
Albert L Bossier, Jr , J Melton Garrett and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cross_defendant:
CBS Corporation, Eagle, Inc., Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Third_party_plaintiff:
Albert L Bossier, Jr , J Melton Garrett and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
O'Quain et al v. Shell Offshore, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01693
Defendant:
Shell Offshore Inc , Shell Oil Company , Radiator Specialty Company and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph O'Quain and Melissa H. O'Quain
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Francis v. Union Carbide Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv02695
Plaintiff:
Rendon Joseph Francis
Defendant:
Gulf Engineering Company, LLC, Continental Insurance Company , 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porter v. Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd. et al
as 3:2011cv00165
ThirdParty Defendant:
3M Company, Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Frank Beeson and others
Defendant:
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Porter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Porter v. Greater Baton Rouge Port Commisson et al
as 3:2011cv00166
ThirdParty Defendant:
3M Company, Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Frank Beeson and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commisson
Defendant:
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commisson
Plaintiff:
Arthur J Porter and Joyce Marie Porter
Unknown:
Louis J. Lambert, Jr. and Louis J. Lambert, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Pichon et al v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv05897
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Garnett Pichon, Jeanette Garnett Pichon, Jeanette Garnett Pichon and others
Defendant:
Bayer Cropscience, Inc., Seville, Inc., Continental Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 a Removal of Claims Related to Bankruptcy Cases
Hackler v Greater Baton Rouge Port commission
as 3:2008cv00082
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc., Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa, Ltd., South Atlantic & Gulf Coast District International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
Greater Baton Rouge Port Commission, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Hackler, MD, Michael T. Hackler, MD and Michael T. Hackler, MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Michael T. Hackler v. P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Hackler, Michael T. Hackler and Michael T. Hackler
Defendant:
P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
South African Marine Corporation Limited, South African Marine Corporation Limited, Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc., P&O Ports Louisiana, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
