Cases 71 - 80 of 2,468
ADAMS v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68990
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. ADAMS
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68928
Plaintiff:
RALPH D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, AW CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STIRSMAN v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv69017
Plaintiff:
ELMON STIRSMAN
Defendant:
A C AND S INC, AIRCO INC/ THE BOC GROUP, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOPER v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68934
Plaintiff:
ROBERT C COOPER
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC, AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUDSON v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68916
Plaintiff:
GARRY HUDSON
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , C S R LTD , CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOTVASZ v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP et al
as 2:2010cv68798
Plaintiff:
JERRY A KOTVASZ
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP , PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRITTON v. AC AND S, INC et al
as 2:2010cv68942
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP H BRITTON
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, AIRCO INC/THE BOC GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENNETT v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv68968
Plaintiff:
JACK L BENNETT
Defendant:
A C AND S INC , CSR LTD, CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOREN v. AC AND S, INC ET AL et al
as 2:2010cv69040
Plaintiff:
JACOB BOREN
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC ET AL , AMERICAN STEEL AND WIRE CO, ANACONDA CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. A.C. & S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv68951
Plaintiff:
FLOYD L. WADE
Defendant:
A.C. & S., INC. , CSR, LTD., CHICAGO FIREBRICK COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
