Cases 71 - 80 of 4,540
BURTON v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86289
Defendant:
BECHTEL CORPORATION, BECHTEL INC. doing business as BECHTEL INC. OF NEVADA also known as C & I GIRDLER COMPANY INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO BECHTEL, INC., ETC., CRANE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIE EARL BURTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86352
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, 3M, D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE D. MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOWLER v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv86746
Plaintiff:
NORMAN FOWLER and NORMAN FOWLER
Defendant:
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION, AB ELECTROLUX, SPIRAX-SARCO, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TALLEY v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86373
Defendant:
MORTON INTERNATIONAL, INC., VIACOM, INC., D.B. RILEY, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
QUINCY L. TALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VISSER v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86518
Plaintiff:
JOHAN VISSER
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DRUM, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86558
Plaintiff:
GLEN EARL DRUM
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRANKS, ET AL V. 3M ET AL
as 2:2008cv86564
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE FRANKS
Defendant:
3M, A-BEX CORPORATION, A.K. STEEL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HATTEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86910
Plaintiff:
EZRA RAY HATTEN
Defendant:
3M, AK STEEL CORPORATION, MT. VERNON MILLS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHILDRESS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86290
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, D.B. RILEY, INC., 3M and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN B. CHILDRESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv86329
Defendant:
OAKFABCO, INC., UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
