Cases 71 - 80 of 351
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv16031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
CAVER v. ROSS STORES INC.
as 3:2021cv15736
Plaintiff:
SOPHIA CAVER
Defendant:
ROSS STORES INC. D/B/A DD'S DISCOUNTS, ROSS STORES INC. doing business as DD'S DISCOUNTS, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACKSON v. DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION et al
as 3:2021cv15634
Plaintiff:
KELLY JACKSON
Defendant:
DOLLAR GENERAL CORPORATION, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-100, ABC CORPORATION 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GONZALEZ v. ALMEIDA et al
as 1:2021cv15564
Plaintiff:
JAILEEN GONZALEZ
Defendant:
RENE ALMEIDA and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SPEARS v. WESTROCK COMPANY
as 3:2021cv14550
Plaintiff:
MARCELLOUS SPEARS
Defendant:
WESTROCK COMPANY, ABC CORP 1-10 and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEAN v. KAPANADZE et al
as 3:2021cv14561
Plaintiff:
NICOLE DEAN
Defendant:
MALKAHZI KAPANADZE, GOLDEN FISH LOGISTIC SOLUTIONS, LTD, JOHN/JANE DOE 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DIAZ v. PRUENAL et al
as 1:2021cv14266
Plaintiff:
MARIA E. DIAZ
Defendant:
ANDREW P. PRUENAL, WATSONTOWN TRUCKING COMPANY, INC., WATSON TRUCKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CONNOR v. STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv13476
Plaintiff:
SUSAN L. CONNOR
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY, ABC COMPANIES 1-5 and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LUNGER v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 3:2021cv12382
Defendant:
JOHN / JANE DOES 1-10, DENIS MCDONOUGH and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LUNGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
MORALES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv12138
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, JOHN/JANE DOE 1, JOHN/JANE DOES 2-10 and others
Plaintiff:
NATASHA MORALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
