Cases 71 - 80 of 153
CRNJAK et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv03247
Plaintiff:
CLIFFORD CRNJAK , DAVID ERICKSON , BETTY FAZENBAKER and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PETERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72192
Plaintiff:
LEONARD H. PETERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72193
Plaintiff:
LOUIS E. PETERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72191
Plaintiff:
ERNEST G. PETERSON
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40397
Plaintiff:
WARREN J. PETERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PETERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39962
Plaintiff:
HAROLD G PETERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PETERSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38221
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL E. PETERSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PETERSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. INC. et al
as 2:2010cv67008
Plaintiff:
JERRY V. PETERSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD IND. INC., EASTERN MAGNESIA TALC, FLEXITALLIC INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON v. AC&S INC et al
as 2:2010cv64553
Plaintiff:
WAYNE C PETERSON
Defendant:
AC&S INC , CSR LTD, DRESSER INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PETERSON V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35802
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
