Cases 71 - 80 of 1,451
Thompson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03556
Plaintiff:
Jamel D. Thompson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ford v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03496
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Ford
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hackett v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03398
Plaintiff:
Brenda D. Hackett
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McLaughlin v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03372
Plaintiff:
Hailey D. McLaughlin
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03344
Plaintiff:
John D Powell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Perez v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
Rhonda D Perez
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Taylor et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03208
Plaintiff:
David D. Taylor and Yvette Taylor
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03118
Plaintiff:
Charles D Johns
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gray v. Winton Woods City Schools, et al
as 1:2023cv00553
Plaintiff:
Kathryn gray and Kathryn D. Gray
Defendant:
Winton Woods City Schools, Anthony smith, Steven denny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Briner v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02845
Plaintiff:
Randy D. Briner
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
