Cases 81 - 90 of 1,456
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Mario Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lynn v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
William Lynn
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Philip D. Williams
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robertson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
William Robertson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kelly v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
William P. Kelly
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Clifford Duane Williams and Beverly Williams
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Barbara Williams
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04147
Plaintiff:
William B. Hill, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
