Cases 81 - 88 of 88
FAUCETT v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64776
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EDWARD HORTON and HAROLD EDWARD HORTON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HARRISON v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64800
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EDWARD HORTON and HAROLD EDWARD HORTON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
COHILL v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64796
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EDWARD HORTON and HAROLD EDWARD HORTON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ISBELL v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64803
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EDWARD HORTON and HAROLD EDWARD HORTON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHAMBERS v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64794
Plaintiff:
HAROLD EDWARD HORTON and HAROLD EDWARD HORTON
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., AP GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
CHANDLER v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv64300
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARSHALL CHANDLER
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S, INC., A P GREEN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PARKER v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv65520
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DONALD PARKER
Defendant:
KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S INC, A P GREEN INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RILEY v. A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. et al
as 2:2007cv63255
Plaintiff:
IRENE RILEY
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
