Cases 1 - 10 of 58
LAI v. JARVIS et al
as 2:2019cv05363
Defendant:
MICHAEL A. JARVIS, JEANETTE M. JARVIS and DONALD E. JARVIS
Plaintiff:
HIUWOON LAI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Jarvis v. Merck & Co, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20154
Plaintiff:
Shirley Jarvis
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, MERCK & CO., INC. and MERCK SHARPE & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Diss et al v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv20074
Plaintiff:
Joseph Engolia, Cecil Campbell, Victor Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC., MCKESSON CORP. and MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JARVIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02904
Plaintiff:
CAROL COFFEY JARVIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , C.R. BARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
NIXON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03352
Plaintiff:
JEFF NIXON , JOYCE NIXON , MICHELLE ANN ENIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JONES , ROBERT HARRIS , KEVIN LEWIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOYD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
BRENT BOYD, MARGENE ADKINS, FRED ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JARVIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57254
Plaintiff:
BILLY R. JARVIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JARVIS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv05847
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. JARVIS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JARVIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv35513
Plaintiff:
DAVID E. JARVIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
