Cases 1 - 8 of 8
THOMPSON v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68417
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMPSON v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49623
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
THOMPSON v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64849
Plaintiff:
JOHN B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMPSON et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN et al
as 2:2010cv37938
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. THOMPSON , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT ISBRANDTSEN, AMERICAN EXPORT LINES, INCORPORATED, AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES, LIMITED and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
THOMPSON et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv93576
Plaintiff:
CECIL THOMPSON and MARGIE B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and RILEY POWER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88911
Plaintiff:
MARVIN B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88246
Plaintiff:
MARVIN B. THOMPSON and MILDRED THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77593
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. THOMPSON and WILLIAM B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
