Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BOWEN v. HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
as 1:2023cv01981
Plaintiff:
FEKRA BOWEN
Defendant:
HENKEL CONSUMER GOODS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
BEIN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv02160
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BEIN, BRIAN BENGIER, JUSTIN BISCIAIO and others
Not Classified By Court:
RHONDA COMSTOCK, KC BROWN, KYLE BROWN and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran and ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
RASMUSSEN v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02059
Plaintiff:
Dylan Rasmussen
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HANKERSON v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02058
Plaintiff:
Jhaquille Hankerson
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC., ALTRIA GROUP, INC., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BOWEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 1:2010cv02163
Plaintiff:
BRENDA BOWEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BERRY et al v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 1:2009cv00127
Plaintiff:
HARVEY BERRY, JOANNE BOWEN, SHARMAN BOWLES and others
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA, LP
Cause Of Action: Diversity
OWENS et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN et al
as 1:2008cv01378
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS, JAMES OWENS, JAMES OWENS and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE SUDAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
OWENS, et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al
as 1:2001cv02244
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS , GARY ROBERT OWENS , BARBARA GOFF and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and others
Movant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and ELIZABETH HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
