Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Bowen v. DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
as 1:2023dp20025
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BOWEN
Defendant:
DePuy Synthes Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bowen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02417
Plaintiff:
Sylvia A. Bowen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator v. Monsees et al
as 2:2022cv02625
Plaintiff:
Estate of Emily Reardon, James Reardon Administrator
Defendant:
James Monsees, Philip Morris USA Inc., Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bowen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04176
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bowen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowens v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05134
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wanda Bowens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowen v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv02861
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bowen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Bowen, et al.
as 4:2020cv00071
Defendant:
Walen Wine, Officer Parker, Officer Nolte and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. Turner et al
as 4:2017cv02684
Plaintiff:
Andre D. Rice
Defendant:
Neil Turner, Taggered Boyd, James Craig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 2:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Maria Bowen
Defendant:
Starbucks Coffee Company , Starbucks , ABC LLC or Corp 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bowen v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00212
Plaintiff:
Shirley J. Bowen
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
