Cases 1 - 8 of 8
HARRIS et al v. ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD.
as 2:2011cv66225
Plaintiff:
DELLA M HARRIS and ORAL C HARRIS
Defendant:
ASBESTOS CORPORATION, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS ET AL v. COSMOPOLITAN STEAMSHIP CO. ET AL
as 2:2011cv33832
Plaintiff:
THOMAS C HARRIS and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
COSMOPOLITAN STEAMSHIP CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv53430
Plaintiff:
MILTON C. HARRIS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61059
Plaintiff:
ISABELLE C. HARRIS, ISABELLE C. HARRIS and ISABELLE C. HARRIS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, ACANDS, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS et al v. FLINTKOTE COMPANY et al
as 2:2010cv60118
Plaintiff:
ORAL C HARRIS, ORAL C HARRIS, DELLA M HARRIS and others
Defendant:
FLINTKOTE COMPANY, FLINTKOTE COMPANY, FLINTKOTE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64060
Plaintiff:
WILEY C. HARRIS and WILEY C. HARRIS
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62799
Plaintiff:
GARY C. HARRIS, SR., GARY C. HARRIS, SR., GARY C. HARRIS, SR. and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., MCCORMICK ASBESTOS COMPANY, PORTER HAYDEN COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. et al
as 2:2007cv60493
Plaintiff:
MELVIN C HARRIS and BEVERLY K HARRIS
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATIN, ACANDS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
