Cases 1 - 10 of 19,744
Vargas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03962
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson & Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Vargas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bevell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03954
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Tamara L Bevell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wenke et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03943
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson & Company, C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Marcy Wenke and Michael Wenke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rivera v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03939
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beltran v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03936
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Beltran
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Beggs et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03917
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Kerri Beggs and Michael Beggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Foge v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03591
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Plaintiff:
Matthew Foge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Santos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03893
Plaintiff:
Rosita Santos
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
MacMichael v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03443
Plaintiff:
Chris MacMichael
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fitzpatrick v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03879
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janice Fitzpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
