Cases 1 - 8 of 8
SCHMITZ et al v. ERICSSON INC. et al
as 1:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
MARK SCHMITZ, SUZANNE SCHMITZ, DIANE FOLEY and others
Defendant:
ERICSSON INC. and TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
DAVIS et al v. MTN GROUP LIMITED et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
GUY L DAVIS, TERESITA R DAVIS, AYLA M DAVIS and others
Defendant:
MTN GROUP LIMITED, MTN IRANCELL TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES COMPANY, PHUTHUMA NHLEKO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2331 Anti-terrorism Act
MARTINO et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2021cv01808
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MARTINO, SYBIL MARTINO, DOROTHY ACKLIN and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
CAIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv03172
Plaintiff:
MARY L. PRINCE CAIN
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 1:2019cv01248
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE RAE CAIN
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON, PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
CAIN v. HARRIS TEETER, INC.
as 1:2012cv00854
Plaintiff:
DARRELL CAIN
Defendant:
HARRIS TEETER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
