Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Turner v. Advantage GPS et al
as 3:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Advantage GPS, Procon Analytics, Porsche Cars of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Turner v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01771
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc., Federal Trade Commission, USSOCOM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Turner et al v. Moreno et al
as 3:2023cv04021
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner and Samuel Henry Russo
Defendant:
Jennifer Moreno, Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Resolution Management Diversity & Inclusion (ORMDI) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Turner et al v. Methodist Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv03962
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner and Latoshann Thompson
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital, CHI Health Mercy, Nebraska Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Turner et al v. Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2023cv03543
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner, I, Christopher Martinez and Terrance Turner
Defendant:
Salinas Valley Memorial Hospital, Stanford Neuroscience Health Center, Southwestern Vermont Medical Center Surgery Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
(PS) Silva v. US Army et al
as 2:2020cv01130
Defendant:
Teva, Cadista, CIA and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton Silva
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terry Digiovanni v. Pentagon, et al
as 2:2016cv08836
Defendant:
AA Central Offices, AA Club, AA Club and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Digiovanni
Zhimin Cheng v. U S Government CIA et al
as 2:2013cv00324
Plaintiff:
Zhimin Cheng
Defendant:
Egro and U S Government CIA
Carol Lee Randolph Shulman v. CIA
as 2:2011cv00188
Defendant:
CIA
Plaintiff:
Carol Lee Randolph Shulman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
