Torts - Injury Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cecil v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03292
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff: Carol Cecil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelly et al v. America Multi-Cinema, Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00051
Defendant: America Multi-Cinema, Inc, ABC Corporations 1-3, Jordan Kass and others
Plaintiff: Renee Kelly and Cecil Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Uzomba v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00302
Defendant: Cecil F. Adams, Jr., Sam Heaton, Doe and others
Plaintiff: Kennedy Uzomba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Biggs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01652
Plaintiff: Cecil Biggs
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brannan et al v. Wright Medical Technology, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv04431
Plaintiff: Constance Brannan and Cecil Brannan
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burnett v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv03360
Plaintiff: Cecil Burnett
Defendant: Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOUNTAIN v. WOLF CREEK LANDFILL LLC
as 5:2013cv00245
Plaintiff: CECIL FOUNTAIN, JR
Defendant: WOLF CREEK LANDFILL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
HARRIS v. CROOM
as 1:2012cv00029
Plaintiff: CONNITH DAWN HARRIS
Defendant: CECIL CROOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daniel v. Nordictrack Inc et al
as 1:2011cv00132
Plaintiff: Cecil Daniel
Defendant: Nordictrack Inc , Icon Health & Fitness Inc and Sears Roebuck and Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vandyke v. Cobb et al
as 2:2010cv00137
Plaintiff: Cecil Ray Vandyke
Defendant: Becky Cobb, Jimmy Cobb, Billy Ray Cromer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?