Cases 1 - 10 of 22
COLVIN v. MALDONADO
as 2:2023cv02180
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY COLVIN
Defendant:
CARLOS J MALDONADO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
COLVIN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06054
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ELAINE A. COLVIN and JOHN E. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILEY v. COLVIN et al
as 2:2019cv02544
Plaintiff:
SHANNAN D. WILEY
Defendant:
RICHARD A. COLVIN and KYLE TRUNK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
WANDA COLVIN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JORDAN et al v. THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv02802
Plaintiff:
LEE ROY JORDAN , RANDY WHITE , RAYFIELD WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
THE NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66405
Plaintiff:
JAMES COLVIN
Defendant:
3M, ALLIS CHALMERS CORPORATION PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66045
Plaintiff:
BRANCH H. COLVIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65715
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. COLVIN and HAZEL M. COLVIN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLVIN et al v. WAL-MART STROES EAST, L.P. et al
as 5:2011cv00009
Plaintiff:
DIXIE COLVIN and TOM COLVIN
Defendant:
WAL-MART STROES EAST, L.P. , WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COLVIN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66167
Plaintiff:
LEVATER COLVIN and EDWIN PARMS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
