Cases 1 - 5 of 5
MYKOFF et al v. HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv13110
Plaintiff:
Ron Greenberg and Abraham Mykoff
Defendant:
Scott Fluger, DOES 1 TO 100, Jim Cahill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION et al v. AMERADA HESS CORP., et al
as 3:2015cv06468
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , THE ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and others
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, COASTAL EAGLE POINT OIL COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., LUKOIL AMERICAS CORPORATION, H.P. DELTA, INC. and others
Cross_defendant:
GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC., AMERADA HESS CORP., GETTY PROPERTIES CORP. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP.
Thirdparty_defendant:
H.P. DELTA, INC. , ROBERT MELECCI , DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
H.P. DELTA, INC., DHANDI TRANSPORT, INC. and EXXONMOBIL OIL CORPORATION
Counter_defendant:
GETTY PROPERTIES CORP., GETTY PETROLEUM MARKETING INC. and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PANARRA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv03668
Plaintiff:
JOAQUIN FERREIRA PANARRA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GEORGE et al v. EAST ORANGE HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2015cv02296
Plaintiff:
C. TATE GEORGE, GEORGE GROUP LLC and ALEXYS HEIGHTS LLC
Defendant:
EAST ORANGE HOUSING AUTHORITY , MARK DAMATO , UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
JOHNSON v. STATE OF NEW YORK et al
as 2:2008cv00231
Plaintiff:
PHILIP JOHNSON
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW YORK, CITY OF NEW YORK, N.Y. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
