Cases 1 - 10 of 63
TAVARES v. COPELAND
as 5:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
JUAN TAVARES
Defendant:
DEREK COPELAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ASHLEY et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05836
Plaintiff:
MARVIN ASHLEY , MANUEL GUTIERREZ , MYRA RUBIN and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05840
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IRA CARROLL , DAMOS CARTER , CHARLES RAY CARTER, SR. and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ABRAHAM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03716
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL D. ABRAHAM , TUNISIA ABRAHAM , HIRAM ALEX and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03124
Plaintiff:
JAMAL ANDERSON , KARSTEN BAILEY , CHRISTIE BAILEY and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPELAND v. AC&S, INC., ET AL. et al
as 2:2012cv60110
Plaintiff:
HENRY COPELAND
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., ET AL., PFIZER, INC. and QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COPELAND v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv58100
Plaintiff:
EARL E. COPELAND
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COPELAND v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2011cv58099
Plaintiff:
EARL E. COPELAND
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COPELAND v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44192
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. COPELAND
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COPELAND v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv67259
Plaintiff:
CLIFTON COPELAND
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
