Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BOESENHOFER et al v. FOSTER WHEELER LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01254
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BOESENHOFER and DIANE BOESENHOFER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC , AECOM, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF and others
Cross_claimant:
BEAZER EAST , J.H. FRANCE REFRACTORIES CO. and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Cross_defendant:
AECOM, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF, ATLANTIC RICHFIELD CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CARABALLO et al v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv64043
Plaintiff:
CESAR CARABALLO and CESAR CARMEN IRIS
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORPORATION , BORINQUEN INSULATION COMPANY, LITWIN CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SPENCER et al v. 84 LUMBER et al
as 2:2011cv01184
Plaintiff:
CORA SPENCER
Defendant:
84 LUMBER, WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, WEIL MCLAIN and others
Movant:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IVERY et al v. AMERICAN CHEMET CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv91336
Plaintiff:
HENRY IVERY and NOVELLA IVERY
Defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMET CORP., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
PETRARCA et al v. AMERICAN CHEMET CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv91333
Plaintiff:
FRANK PETRARCA and MARY PETRARCA
Defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMET CORP., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WERSTLER et al v. AMERICAN CHEMET CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv91338
Plaintiff:
BOBB WERSTLER and NORMA WERSTLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMET CORP., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATKINS et al v. AMERICAN CHEMET CORP. et al
as 2:2009cv91337
Plaintiff:
LEON WATKINS and BERTHA LOU WATKINS
Defendant:
AMERICAN CHEMET CORP., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
