Cases 1 - 8 of 8
COOK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41526
Plaintiff:
HARRY D. COOK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COOK et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64503
Plaintiff:
ADOLPH F. COOK and IDA D. COOK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
COOK et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63803
Plaintiff:
BERNARD D. COOK and RUTH WORLEY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH et al v. AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2010cv63607
Plaintiff:
LEO BRANCH , EARL E. BREWER , HARVEY T. BROOKS and others
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC.(ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOK et al v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88816
Plaintiff:
BILLY D. COOK
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOK v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88398
Plaintiff:
BILLY D. COOK
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOK et al v. FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv66794
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM G. COOK and SHARRI D. COOK
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION, GARLOCK, INC., OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COOK v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv60645
Plaintiff:
JOHN D. COOK, JR., JOHN D. COOK, JR., JOHN D. COOK, JR. and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
