Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Hyde v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dianne Hyde
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fowler v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Diann Fowler
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fett et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02502
Plaintiff:
ALLAN FETT and DIANNE JOHNSON FETT
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walls v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Dianne Walls
Defendant:
DAVOL,INC./C.R. BARD, INC. and Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Murphy et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03376
Plaintiff:
Robert Murphy and Dianne Smith Murphy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02439
Plaintiff:
Estate of Peter Garcia and Dianne Moratti
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knight v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2021cv05413
Plaintiff:
Dianne Knight
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gremillion v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv04508
Plaintiff:
Dianne Gremillion
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lockridge et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03950
Plaintiff:
Frank Lockridge and Dianne M Lockridge
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holford et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03863
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
DIANNE E. HOLFORD and JOHN J. HOLFORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
