Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Englund v. Lippert
as 2:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
David Bruce Englund
Defendant:
David Floyd Lippert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
FLOYD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09759
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLOYD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Floyd et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv16289
Plaintiff:
David Floyd and Michelle Floyd
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Snyder v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05252
Plaintiff:
SHEILA K SNYDER and David Floyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CHALELA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv34701
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLOYD CHALELA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05142
Plaintiff:
David Floyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLOYD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45033
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2019cv02591
Plaintiff:
David Floyd
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wetzel v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00269
Plaintiff:
David Floyd Wetzel
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Floyd v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00123
Plaintiff:
David Floyd
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
