Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Dixon v. Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Susan Dixon
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Dixon v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
as 0:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
Ethel Dixon
Defendant:
Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Shell-Dixon et al v. Burton et al
as 2:2022cv00004
Plaintiff:
Porsha Shell-Dixon and P.D.
Defendant:
Kent N. Burton, Blair Logistics, LLC and P&S Transportation LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marcum et al v. Dixon et al
as 5:2021cv00071
Defendant:
Michael L. Dixon, Randall Robinson doing business as Randy's Towing, Randall Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
John Marcum, Julie Marcum and Cecil Marcum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Dixon et al v. River Town Construction, LLC
as 4:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Steve Dixon and Julie Dixon
Defendant:
River Town Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00470
Plaintiff:
Patricia Martin , Debra Witten , Mary Sanford and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00839
Plaintiff:
Amanda Dixon
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hart v. Dixon et al
as 1:2014cv00116
Plaintiff:
Turner W. Hart, Sr.
Defendant:
Richard Dixon and Moose Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
Mavis Dixon
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon v. Singh et al
as 3:2013cv00687
Plaintiff:
Vickie Dixon
Defendant:
Sahb Singh and Prime Time Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
