Cases 1 - 8 of 8
FRIED v. LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2017cv01375
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FRIED
Defendant:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATTHEWS v. SINCLAIR MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SINCLAIR MOVING AND STORAGE, INC. and EDWARD FRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENKINS v. KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN et al
as 2:2012cv06092
Plaintiff:
GEORGE JENKINS
Defendant:
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN and KFC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
FRIES v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68436
Plaintiff:
DARRELL E. FRIES, DARRELL E. FRIES, DARRELL E. FRIES and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FRIES v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv68284
Plaintiff:
DARRELL E. FRIES, DARRELL E. FRIES, DARRELL E. FRIES and others
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC, ACANDS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FRIED v. A.P.I., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv66593
Plaintiff:
HERBERT FRIED
Defendant:
A.P.I., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE and MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, THE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FRIED et al v. CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv60223
Plaintiff:
JAMES W FRIED, JAMES W FRIED, RITA FRIED and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK AND SEAL COMPANY, INC. GARLOCK, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
FRIED v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68609
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER FRIED
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO., A.C. &S., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
