Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Hamilton et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03070
Plaintiff:
Betty Gayle Hamilton and James L Hamilton, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Vliek v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02086
Plaintiff:
Gayle Vliek
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gayle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Margie Gayle
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steer v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02828
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gayle Steer
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tatham et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04840
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Tatham and Rebecca Gayle Tatham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kollman v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2020cv01746
Plaintiff:
Gayle H. Kollman
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knott v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv04637
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gayle Knott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gayle v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03272
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Toni Gayle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02872
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gayle Smith and Jeffrey Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brose et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01347
Plaintiff:
Nancy Brose and Gayle Brose
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
