Cases 1 - 6 of 6
HERBST et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14501
Plaintiff:
MARSHA ANNE HERBST and JAMES HERBST
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
State Farm Indemnity Company a/s/o Joseph G. Laskowicz and STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Judites Dosreis, Kimberly A Herbst and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 2:2022cv02439
Plaintiff:
STATE FARM INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Judites Dosreis, Kimberly A Herbst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
LISA M. SEEBACKER AND TAMI C. HERBST, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JUDY A. HERBST v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv13204
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
LISA M. SEEBACKER AND TAMI C. HERBST, AS CO-EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JUDY A. HERBST
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold et al v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company et al
as 3:2013cv03612
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Arnold , Vicky Arnold , David E. Bowles and others
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HERBST v. BIOMET, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02714
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN HERBST
Defendant:
BIOMET, INC., BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS, LLC, BIOMET MANUFACTURING CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
