Cases 1 - 10 of 44,036
Iwasaki v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03287
Plaintiff:
Thomas Iwasaki
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hilliard v. DePuy Inc. et al.
as 1:2024dp20005
Plaintiff:
Lisa Hilliard
Defendant:
DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mart v. DePuy Inc et al.
as 1:2024dp20006
Plaintiff:
Danny Mart
Defendant:
DePuy Inc, DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gallegos v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03284
Plaintiff:
Patricia Gallegos
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Noland v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03262
Plaintiff:
Earl Noland
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Griffis v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03296
Plaintiff:
Shawn Griffis
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03275
Plaintiff:
Edwin Hall
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fitzgerald v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
Billy Fitzgerald
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Frazier v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03279
Plaintiff:
Joe Frazier
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Graves v. CR Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03280
Plaintiff:
Marvin Graves
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
