Cases 1 - 10 of 20
IRBY et al v. XHENG et al
as 2:2018cv00148
Plaintiff:
CHARLES IRBY and NINIA DAVIS
Defendant:
KATHERINE XHENG and YUPING XHENG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRBY v. SAVE-A-LOT, LTD. et al
as 2:2014cv05337
Plaintiff:
VENUS K. IRBY
Defendant:
SAVE-A-LOT, LTD. and MORAN FOODS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRBY v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv47023
Plaintiff:
JOHN IRBY, SR
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
IRBY v. AMERADA HESS CORP.
as 2:2011cv47022
Plaintiff:
JOHN IRBY, SR
Defendant:
AMERADA HESS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH et al v. A.C.S., INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60504
Plaintiff:
IRBY SMITH and MOZEL SMITH
Defendant:
A.C.S., INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TILLMAN v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80553
Plaintiff:
IRBY ALONZO TILLMAN, SR
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRBY v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv41356
Plaintiff:
LEE H. IRBY
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
IRBY v. AC AND S INC et al
as 2:2010cv67675
Plaintiff:
DENISE IRBY
Defendant:
AC AND S INC , AP GREEN INDUSTRIES , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IRBY v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61197
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. IRBY
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
IRBY v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv78248
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. IRBY and DANIEL M. IRBY
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
