Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Warren v. AFAM Concept, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01107
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC, AFAM Concept, Inc. doing business as JP Labs, Inc., House of Cheatham, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JP v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01136
Plaintiff:
JP
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bowling v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Sara Bowling and Sara E Bowling
Defendant:
Stephon T Smith and JP Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Brown v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2020cv04893
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Jean Brown
Defendant:
Erika Williams, James D. Montgomery & Associates, Ltd., JP Morgan Chase Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
McBride v. Quality Carriers, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Carlettas McBride
Defendant:
Quality Carriers, Inc., Michael V Moore and Triple JP Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Grove et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2019cv01418
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Thomas Mathers and Janet Grove
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2019cv05590
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Maisha Imani Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
as 1:2017cv00474
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Paul Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2014cv09159
Plaintiff:
Gennard Barber
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
as 1:2019cv09159
Plaintiff:
Gennard Barber
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.