Torts - Injury Cases filed in Pennsylvania
JOBE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51709
Plaintiff: FLOYD C. JOBE
Defendant: A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
JOBE v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv71897
Plaintiff: KATHERINE P. JOBE
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JOBE et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv65366
Plaintiff: MARJORIE JOBE, MARJORIE JOBE, MARJORIE JOBE and others
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JOBE et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv86628
Plaintiff: BRENDA S. JOBE
Defendant: ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., A.M. LOCKETT & COMPANY, LTD., ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
JOBE v. A. W. CHESTERTON et al
as 5:2008cv87059
Plaintiff: JEFFERSON D. JOBE and JEFFERSON D. JOBE
Defendant: A. W. CHESTERTON, CERTAINTEED CORP., DURAMETALLIC CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Torts - Injury None
JACKSON et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2008cv02895
Plaintiff: CHARLENE JACKSON, DAVID M. JACKSON, DAVID M. JACKSON, JR. and others
Defendant: SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BREEDEN v. ABEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv65018
Plaintiff: JOBE O. BREEDEN, JOBE O. BREEDEN, JOBE O. BREEDEN and others
Defendant: ABEX CORPORATION, AMERICAN STANDARD, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?