Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Shimp v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
June Shimp
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Afalava v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65499
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser LLC, Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC, Indivior Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
June Afalava
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Forrest v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv02886
Plaintiff:
June Forrest
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kell v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01516
Plaintiff:
June Kell
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saucier v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
June C Saucier
Defendant:
CR Bard, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johns v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05941
Plaintiff:
June Johns
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Buren et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv04125
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gregory Buren and June K. Buren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dunlap v. Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2019cv05103
Plaintiff:
June Dunlap
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./ C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purnell v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2019cv04474
Plaintiff:
June Purnell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bolden v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Davol Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
June Bolden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
