Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Logue v. Patient First Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv01823
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. Logue
Defendant:
Patient First Corporation , Patient First Urgent Care, East York and Esmeralda Del Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOGUE et al v. ECKMAN et al
as 5:2012cv03942
Plaintiff:
MARK LOGUE and LISA LOGUE
Defendant:
MICHAEL S. ECKMAN , BLACK THIUNDER POWERBOATS, INC. and GARELICK MFG. CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79941
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79957
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79951
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79944
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79949
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79950
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79954
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv80171
Plaintiff:
LOGUS L. ADAMS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., CAREY CANADA, INC., THE CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
