Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BLACKSON v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
PAUL BLACKSON
Defendant:
HARUN A. MATTHEWS, LUTHER LEE GRIFFIN, III, WHEELZ TRUCKING LLC doing business as WHEELZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Beers v. Northumberland County et al
as 4:2022cv01101
Plaintiff:
Sherry Beers
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Bruce Kovach, Samuel J. Schiccatano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson et al v. LaFond et al
as 2:2021cv01956
Plaintiff:
Constance A Thompson and Calvin J Thompson
Defendant:
HERTZ, Rebecca LaFond, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson et al v. LaFond et al
as 2:2021cv01932
Plaintiff:
Constance A Thompson and Calvin J Thompson
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATIONS, Hertz Car Rentals, HERTZ and others
Nominal Defendant:
WHITE DR. MARY DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FLINN et al v. CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORP. et al
as 2:2017cv01097
Plaintiff:
DONALD FLINN and GUIZHEM FLINN
Defendant:
CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT CORP., JOHN DOE, MARY DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOUCK et al v. MACY'S, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04084
Plaintiff:
ELEANOR HOUCK and CLARENCE HOUCK
Defendant:
MACY'S, INC., MACY'S RETAIL HOLDINGS, INC., JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOE et al v. ST. JOSEPH et al
as 2:2012cv03551
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and MARY DOE
Defendant:
THOMAS G. ST. JOSEPH , MARY ST. JOSEPH and MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING CENTER OF DELAWARE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BOE v. HUNTER et al
as 2:2010cv00915
Plaintiff:
AGATHA B. BOE
Defendant:
MILES D. HUNTER, DAVIS TRANSIT, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARY DOE v. MATCH.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2004cv00938
Plaintiff:
MARY DOE
Defendant:
MATCH.COM, INC., MATCH.COM, INC., MATCH.COM, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
