Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Meyer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02451
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Meyer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Douglas Meyers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03897
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Meyer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Meyer v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv01287
Plaintiff:
Kelly Meyer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyer v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
CASSIDY MARIE MEYER
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barnett et al v. The Kroger Company et al
as 1:2022cv00544
Plaintiff:
Tasheba Barnett, Adele Hoffman and Chadaela Lovincey
Defendant:
The Kroger Company d/b/a Simple Truth Organic, Harris Teeter, LLC, Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Sarah Meyer and Sandra Meyer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Meyers v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv01148
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Glenda H. Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyers v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05882
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Earnestine Y Meyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
