Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CZARNOTA v. ONEBEACON INSURANCE GROUP, LLP
as 2:2012cv00860
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CZARNOTA
Defendant:
ONEBEACON INSURANCE GROUP, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ECKERLE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC.
as 2:2010cv82905
Plaintiff:
RONALD ECKERLE
Defendant:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC. , J.D. ROBERTS, AMERICAN MOTORISTS INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ECKERLE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv91461
Defendant:
HOPEMAN BROTHERS MARINE INTERIORS, LLC, NITRAM ENERGY, INC., GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
BETTY NAJOLIA ECKERLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEPLOWSKI et al v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91130
Plaintiff:
JUDY PEPLOWSKI and JOSEPHINE BORSICK
Defendant:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BECNEL et al v. ANCO INSULATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv84556
Plaintiff:
GAIL BECNEL, GAIL BECNEL, GAIL BECNEL and others
Defendant:
ANCO INSULATIONS, INC., MCCARTY CORPORATION, OWENS ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COLE v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv74195
Plaintiff:
LEIGH SR. COLE, LEIGH SR. COLE and LEIGH SR. COLE
Defendant:
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC., NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIP SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
TAYLOR et al v. ANCO INSULATIONS INC et al
as 2:2007cv74052
Plaintiff:
JIM TAYLOR, JIM TAYLOR, JIM TAYLOR and others
Defendant:
ANCO INSULATIONS INC, AQUA-CHEM, INC., FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
