Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Austin et al v. Novo Nordisk, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tommie Austin, Paulsen Bronston, Patricia Brooks and others
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES L.P., NOVO NORDISK RESEARCH CENTER SEATTLE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAULSEN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
as 2:2020cv01180
Plaintiff:
BONNIE K. PAULSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
PAULSEN v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57470
Plaintiff:
KARL N. PAULSEN
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PAULSEN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54729
Plaintiff:
KARL N PAULSEN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BEVAN et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06372
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. BEVAN , DALE CHRISTOFFERSEN , CHARLES GARRETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAULSEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57121
Plaintiff:
DONALD E PAULSEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PAULSEN et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv82186
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. PAULSEN
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAULSEN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv72155
Plaintiff:
IRVING J. PAULSEN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PAULSEN et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2010cv50389
Plaintiff:
KARL N. PAULSEN and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
PAULSEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv04025
Plaintiff:
RAMON PAULSEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
