Cases 1 - 10 of 18
OSTROWSKI et al v. PETSMART, INC.
as 1:2021cv01591
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-5, PETSMART, INC. and ROE CORPORATIONS 1-5
Plaintiff:
MARIA OSTROWSKI and JOSEPH OSTROWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
HUNT et al v. PETSMART, INC.
as 3:2020cv20491
Defendant:
PETSMART, INC. and JOHN DOE 1-10
Plaintiff:
DANIEL HUNT and GALE HUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALTOBELLI v. PETSMART, INC.
as 3:2020cv06563
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, PETSMART, INC. and ABC CO'S 1-10
Plaintiff:
BARBARA ALTOBELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
RADBILL et al v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv05261
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATIONS, XYZ ENTITIES 1-15, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH P. RADBILL and DENISE RADBILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOONE v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv05926
Defendant:
PETSMART, INC., JOHN DOES 1-5 and ABC COMPANIES 1-5
Plaintiff:
GENEVA BOONE and GENEVA E. BOONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCNELIS v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00068
Defendant:
PETSMART, INC., ABC CORP(S) 1-10, PROPERTY OWNER(S) and others
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE MCNELIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
VELASQUEZ v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv16322
Defendant:
JOHN DOES I TO C, PETSMART, INC., JOHN DOES PARTNERSHIP I TO C and others
Plaintiff:
NILDA VELASQUEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
O'CONNOR v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv12880
Defendant:
AGREE SECAUCUS NJ, LLC, ABC CORPS 1-5, PETSMART, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MARCIA O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADORNA-ALEX v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 3:2017cv03106
Plaintiff:
DENISE ADORNA-ALEX
Defendant:
PETSMART, INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORP. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
GIBSON et al v. PETSMART, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00172
Plaintiff:
MEGAN GIBSON and TRAVIS GIBSON
Defendant:
PETSMART, INC. and JOHN DOES A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
