Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Canfield et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03336
Plaintiff:
Peter Canfield and Jean Canfield
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol,Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Flavin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03114
Plaintiff:
Peter Flavin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Plaintiff:
Merle Peters
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hirmer v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01991
Plaintiff:
Peter Hirmer
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Carmany v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01978
Plaintiff:
Peter Carmany
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65613
Plaintiff:
Ms. Melissa K. Peters
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02323
Plaintiff:
Laurie Joy Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garcia v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65439
Plaintiff:
Peter Garcia
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Peters v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01174
Plaintiff:
Galen Peters
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dirksen v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01148
Plaintiff:
Peter Jeremy Dirksen
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
