Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Romero v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Romero
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROMERO-CASTRO v. CHAND et al
as 2:2023cv03917
Plaintiff:
JOSE ROMERO-CASTRO
Defendant:
MALAK CHAND and CARGO SOLUTION EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ROMERO v. MARSHALLS, INC. et al
as 5:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROMERO
Defendant:
MARSHALLS, INC., THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. and JOHN DOE #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
ROMERO v. MARSHALLS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03022
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH ROMERO
Defendant:
MARSHALLS, INC., THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. and JOHN DOE #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
UMANA-ROMERO v. GREENBERG
as 2:2023cv01663
Plaintiff:
KATTIA UMANA-ROMERO
Defendant:
RICHARD GREENBERG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ROMERO et al v. INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00217
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ROMERO and ERIC WRIGHT
Defendant:
INTERSTATE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, INC., STARBUCKS CORPORATION, SDi LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Santos-Romero et al v. McDonald
as 3:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
Olga Sanchez and Juan Santos-Romero
Defendant:
Allision L. McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROMERO v. SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2020cv05628
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROMERO
Defendant:
SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
ROMERO v. SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv05628
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO ROMERO
Defendant:
SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Cuellar et al v. LivaNova Deutschland GmbH et al
as 1:2018cv01812
Plaintiff:
Aleyda Romero and Armando Cuellar
Defendant:
LivaNova Holding USA, Inc. and Livanova Deutschland GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
