Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hamric v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01514
Plaintiff:
Seth Hamric
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01137
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Seth Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winterton v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03317
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Seth Winterton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perdue v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2018cv01441
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff:
Seth A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seth v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv02600
Plaintiff:
Lorna Florence Seth
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv01320
Plaintiff:
Seth Dewain Amos
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meyer v. Marten Transport, Ltd. et al
as 3:2014cv01827
Plaintiff:
Seth D. Meyer
Defendant:
Marten Transport, Ltd. and Ian F. Alindogan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bargas v. Adkins et al
as 2:2012cv01142
Plaintiff:
Heather Ann Bargas
Defendant:
Seth T. Adkins and Phipps Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bostick et al v. DePuy International Limited et al
as 1:2011dp22598
Plaintiff:
Seth E. Bostick and Kari R. Bostick
Defendant:
DePuy International Limited , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper, Jr. et al v. Opolka et al
as 5:2011cv02426
Plaintiff:
Francis A Cooper, Jr. , Anisa M Cooper and Seth M Cooper
Defendant:
Eric P Opolka , University of Pittsburgh at Titusville and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
