Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Doe v. Rasier (FL), LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01131
Plaintiff:
jane doe
Defendant:
Rasier (FL), LLC, Rasier, LLC, Rasier-DC, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
kozicharow v. Said
as 8:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
Debra Lynn Kozicharow
Defendant:
Said Shaher Said, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Breidenstein v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 6:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Kevin Breidenstein
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation individually doing business as Amtrak, Rasier LLC, Rasier (FL) LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Rubin et al v. uber Technologies et al
as 2:2021cv14436
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Rubin, Aubrey Rubin and Damian Trejo
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier-CA, LLC, Carlos Ivan Silva Velasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GUZMAN v. TAMBARA
as 1:2021cv21741
Defendant:
MARIO TAMBARA, UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
JIMMY J. GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Santos et al v. Fernandez et al
as 8:2020cv00460
Plaintiff:
Luis Lopez Sierra and Miriam Santos
Defendant:
Raser (FL), LLC a/k/a Raiser, LLC, Rafael Fernandez, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gray v. Uber, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv03093
Plaintiff:
Phillip Gray
Defendant:
Unknown Individuals, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tillman v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00681
Plaintiff:
Summer Tillman
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Pich Allan Michaels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hansen et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv01559
Plaintiff:
Gayna Hansen and Kristopher Hansen
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. and Rasier (FL), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
