Torts - Injury Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Wade v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02408
Plaintiff: Paul Wade
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00510
Plaintiff: Monica Wade
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff: Rozchea Wade
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Molencamp v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02178
Plaintiff: Wade Molencamp
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wade et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff: James Wade and Cheryl Lynn Wade
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pritschau v. Schultz et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00303
Plaintiff: Tyler Pritschau
Defendant: Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company, Uber Technologies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
v. Pritschau et al
as 1:2022cv00302
Defendant: Tyler Pritschau, Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
v. Pritschau et al
as 1:2022oe00302
Defendant: Tyler Pritschau, Wade Schultz, State Farm Automobile Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Schwartz v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00596
Plaintiff: Wade Schwartz
Defendant: CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shamp v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv03638
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Wade Shamp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?