Cases 91 - 100 of 176
Trehern et al v. BP, plc et al
as 1:2010cv00432
Plaintiff:
W. Edward Trehern and Trehern Investments, LLC
Defendant:
BP, plc, BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP Products North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McMinn v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Martha McMinn
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc. , Judy Vail , Woods Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ferdinand v. Globe Union America, Corp., et al
as 3:2010cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ferdinand
Defendant:
Globe Union America, Corp., , Home Depot, USA and John Does I - V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frey et al v. Bayer AG et al
as 4:2010cv00065
Plaintiff:
Leroy Frey , A&L Farms, Inc. , Frey Frey & Frey and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Cropscience LP, Bayer Cropscience AG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Boggs v. Certainteed Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Boggs
Defendant:
Certainteed Corporation, Certainteed Gypsum and Ceiling Manufacturing, Inc. and Certainteed Gypsum, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morrison et al v. United States Gypsum Company
as 1:2010cv00223
Plaintiff:
Robert Morrison and Sandra Morrison
Defendant:
United States Gypsum Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts v. Lafarge North America, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00224
Plaintiff:
Robert Roberts
Defendant:
Lafarge North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alfred v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum, LLC.
as 1:2010cv00221
Plaintiff:
Janice Alfred
Defendant:
Georgia-Pacific Gypsum, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mingo et al v. Lafarge North America, Inc.
as 1:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
James Mingo and Patricia Mingo
Defendant:
Lafarge North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin et al v. Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC
as 1:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
David Martin and Betty Martin
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific Gypsum, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
