Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Abdun-Noor et al v. Katz et al
as 3:2010cv04627
Plaintiff:
Mo'Min Abdun-Noor and Susie Ann Lucas
Defendant:
Mitchell A Katz, Benjamin Rosenfield, James Smothers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bret and Kimberly Lawrence v. Caplan et al
as 5:2010cv02839
Plaintiff:
Bret and Kimberly Lawrence
Defendant:
Mitchel H. Caplan and E*Trade Wholesale Lending Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Saba v. Caplan et al
as 3:2010cv02113
Plaintiff:
Faiyaz H. Saba
Defendant:
Mitchel H. Caplan, All California Mortgage and E*Trade Wholesale Lending Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Saba v. Caplan et al
as 4:2010cv02113
Plaintiff:
Faiyaz H. Saba
Defendant:
Mitchel H. Caplan, All California Mortgage and E*Trade Wholesale Lending Corporation
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Christine Mitchell v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 8:2010cv00591
Plaintiff:
Christine Mitchell
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Cecelia Mitchell v. Accreditted Home Lenders Holding Company et al
as 2:2010cv02484
Defendant:
Accreditted Home Lenders Holding Company, Bank of America, Countrywide Home Loan Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Cecelia Mitchell
Mitchell v. Skyline Homes
as 2:2009cv02241
Plaintiff:
Christina Mitchell and Christina Mitchell
Defendant:
Skyline Homes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Freedman v. Aliphcom
as 4:2009cv00971
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Freedman and Mitchell Freedman
Defendant:
Aliphcom
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Bouyer et al v. Indymac Federal Bank
as 3:2008cv05582
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bouyer, Sr. and Martha E. Bouyer
Defendant:
Indymac Federal Bank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bouyer et al v. Countrywide Bank
as 3:2008cv05583
Plaintiff:
Mitchell E. Bouyer, Jr. and Martha E. Bouyer
Defendant:
Countrywide Bank
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
