Cases 51 - 58 of 58
Tipsword v. I.F.D.A. Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
David Tipsword
Defendant:
I.F.D.A. Services, Inc., Illinois Funeral Director's Association, Linda Allan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Crawford Supply Group, Inc. et al v. LaSalle Bank, N.A.
as 1:2009cv02513
Plaintiff:
Crawford Supply Group, Inc., Feiger Family Properties, LLC, Miriam Feiger and others
Defendant:
LaSalle Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kramer et al v. Stelter et al
as 1:2008cv02530
Plaintiff:
David Kramer and Certified Car Sales, LLC
Defendant:
Steven Stelter, John P Creedon, Michael J Colando and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Garber v. Wrigley et al
as 1:2008cv02449
Plaintiff:
Robert L Garber
Defendant:
William Wrigley, Jr., William D Perez, John F Bard and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HSA Commercial, Inc. v. Stewart et al
as 1:2008cv01805
Plaintiff:
HSA Commercial, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven Stewart and New Vision Development, Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
L'Heureux v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
as 1:2007cv01028
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Plaintiff:
David L'Heureux, Michelle L. Farrell, Peter B. Gayauski and others
Counter Claimant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Counter Defendant:
Michelle L. Farrell, Peter B. Gayauski, Donna L. Gayauski and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Hodor v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co.
as 1:2007cv00318
Plaintiff:
Steven B. Hodor, Steven B. Hodor, Steven B. Hodor and others
Defendant:
Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Ameriquest Mortgage Company, Ameriquest Mortgage Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
